Anybody ever lost to worstfish?

This guy: lichess.org/@/WorstFish/all

I don't see how one could possibly force it to win, since it is designed to not capture the pieces back. I know that sacking the pieces in front of its king may force it to recapture and thus you can get material disadvantage, but being losing in material doesn't mean you will lose the game. So one would need to force it to checkmate you somehow. Is that even possible?

Of course, I'm not talking about losing on time or resigning, I am talking about losing on the board.

I have, the only way one can win is by forcing stockfish to give a mate in one lichess.org/NugkIYth/black#300

Or, you can just resign. What's the point, though?

You could just advanced search for it and look for player: worstfish and winner: worstfish and you find every game where worstfish has won

@SethRayCarlsen said in #5:
> You could just advanced search for it and look for player: worstfish and winner: worstfish and you find every game where worstfish has won

And 99,9% of them will be by abandonment, but that's not what I'm looking for

@WLaver said in #2:
> I have, the only way one can win is by forcing stockfish to give a mate in one

Yeah, I figured it would have to be something like that, really hard to come up with, though. Nice game

@shaashvat said in #3:
>
Nice game. I find this approach easier to understand. You sort of remove all of fish's pieces except for the queen and try to force it to only move the queen. I should try that

Very nice bot. He helps me to win.

Bragging time. lichess.org/F9QkU80rLWnl

I got a fast Win. Sorry I mean lose! lichess.org/FG9KPnTmxoI6